Despite the chargé d’affaires being such a "public minister" contemplated by Article III, Section 2, Clause 2, the case did not "affect" him. That case was a prosecution of a person who "offered violence" against the chargé d’affaires of the King of Spain in the United States. The case that gives the most meaning to "affecting" is United States v. Supreme Court ruled that the word "affecting" (as used in the above quoted part of the Constitution) shall be interpreted only as being a party to a case? Is there any difference between a case affecting someone and a case to which someone is a party? The Supreme Court shall have original but not exclusive jurisdiction of:All actions or proceedings to which ambassadors, other publicministers, consuls, or vice consuls of foreign states are parties In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Courtshall have original Jurisdiction. Is there any difference between cases affecting someone and cases to whch someone is a party?Īrticle III, Section 2, Clause 2 of the U.S.
In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the su. Is there any difference between cases affecting someone and cases to whch someone is a party?,Article III, Section 2, Clause 2 of the U.S.
0 kommentar(er)
